On May 5, Activision Blizzard reported Q1 2016 GAAP Earnings
per share of $0.45 and Revenue of $1.46 billion. They reported non-GAAP EPS of
$0.23 and Revenue of $812.1 million, exceeding analyst’s expectations of $0.12
and $812.12 million, respectively. The company reported strong Monthly average users
(MAUs), totaling 544 million. Total MAUs can be broken down as follows: Activision-
55 million, up 10% from last year, Blizzard- 26 million, up 23%, and King- 463
million, up 3% from the previous quarter. Activision also continues to have
four of the top 10 games on next-gen consoles, and King had three of the top 15
grossing titles in U.S. mobile app stores for the ninth consecutive quarter. Activision
Blizzard didn’t have any major new releases during the first quarter, but did
issue a second expansion pack for its highly popular “Call of Duty: Black Ops
III”. ATVI shares were up 4.1% at $36.35 in after-hours trading, up from its
closing price of $34.85. The stock ended the week strong, closing the post
earnings trading session at $37.45.
Monday, May 9, 2016
AT&T (T) Q1 2016 Earnings
Post market close on April 26th, AT&T
reported first quarter adjusted earnings per share of $0.72. This represents a
year over year increase of 10.8%, and exceeded analyst estimates of $0.69. They
reported Revenue of $40.54 billion, up 24% year over year- largely attributed
to the acquisition of DIRECTV in July of 2015. They continue to show margin
growth, reporting an operating margin of 17.6%, up from 17.1%, with margin
expansion in every domestic business segment. Operating cash flows were up more
than $1 billion from Q1 2015, reporting free cash flow of $3.2 billion, representing
a year over year increase of 17%. They reported operating expenses of $33.4
billion, up from $27 billion in the same quarter last year. Operating income
was reported at $7.1 billion, up 28% from Q1 2015. Despite an otherwise
successful quarter, the wireless business lost 363,000 mainstream phone
connections, exceeding the 200,000 mainstream phone loss that had been expected.
They also lost 54,000 video subscribers, even with gains at DIRECTV. The stock
opened the following day slightly lower at $37.95, but hit an intra-day high at
$38.89, and then ended the day at $38.73.
Saturday, January 16, 2016
PNC Closes 2015 Out Strong; China & Oil Weight on Markets
PNC posted diluted earnings per share of $1.87 which
surpassed Street estimates of $1.80. This represents an earnings surprise of 3.9%
and growth of 1.6% from the same quarter in the prior year. Results were mainly
driven by lower expenses, which unfortunately were offset by lower revenues and
higher provisions for credit losses and net charge offs. Despite the positive report,
the results were masked by worries in China and oil with each of the main
indices down at least 3% in intraday trading. PNC closed the week at $86.36.
Revenue for the quarter came in at $3.85 billion which was down
2.4% from the prior year. The decline was mostly due to a fall in non-interest
income but the figure still beat on consensus revenue estimates. Net income in
the Retail Banking, Asset Management Group and Non-Strategic Assets Portfolio
increased 23.8%, 13.3%, and 23.3%, respectively, from the prior year’s quarter.
Net income in the Corporate & Institutional Banking and Other segments declined
4.4% and 33%, respectively.
Net interest income for the quarter was down 0.2% year over
year due to lower purchase accounting accretion, despite an increase in core
net interest income. PNC’s net interest margin decreased 19 bps to 2.70%. Net
charge offs increased 2% year over year to $120 million and provision for credit
losses rose 42% to $74 million.
In the quarter, PNC repurchased 5.8 million common shares
for $0.5 billion. As of December 31st Basel III common equity tier 1
ratio was 10.7%. Total assets were $358.5 billion, up 3.9% year over year.
Total loans and total deposits increased 0.9% and 7.2%, respectively.
Saturday, October 17, 2015
Union Pacific Earnings Preview
Stock of Union Pacific
edged down to $92.94 this week after an encouraging, month-long climb back to
$97, peaking last week. Curiously, this
rebound, beginning on September 28th, does not seem to be tied to a
specific piece of news. More likely, it
is a correction to its valuation, which was thought by many analysts to be far
below its intrinsic value. We entered
this position over a year ago, and at a price of $92. To recount since then, UNP equity is down 22%
YTD, so despite a slight positive return ITD, we missed perhaps the best time
to exit the position. Union Pacific is
scheduled to release earnings before the trading day of 10/22.
The current macroeconomic climate challenges us to make a decision about exiting this position in advance. Protracted low oil prices
has ushered, as some economists earlier predicted, a structural shift to
petroleum and out of coal. In dollar
terms, coal encompasses nearly one fifth of Union Pacific’s revenue. The U.S. Coal Index, once at 120 nearly a
year ago, now rests at 27, having decreased every month in between. Agricultural price indices have edged
slightly lower. Weakening Chinese
demand, evident in revisions to its GDP forecast, has driven commodity prices
into the ground. Commodities represent
another key freight item—both directly and indirectly—to Union Pacific. To make things worse, China in specific is a
key endpoint for UNP’s cross-country freight.
This, however, represents a global trend; economists at the UN have
already revised estimated global growth down 0.2%. Though Union Pacific has cut capital spending
goals to $4.2 billion from $5 billion, cash flows will be impacted by hits to top-line, trickling down to bottom-line.
The price target of the
revised model, dependent on favorable long-term and perpetual growth rates, can
no longer be justified. As such, cash
flow valuations now hover in the low $100s.
This is in line with the average analyst prediction of $104. The only mixed piece of news is that this
analyst consensus has barely flinched over the last three months (during which much news has taken place.) Only two of
the twenty-two analysts assigning a ‘buy’ rating three months ago, have
downgraded. The aggregate rating, though
slightly lower, is still in strong overweight territory. Nevertheless, it is unlikely UNP will reach
the consensus $1.43 earnings per share this quarter; surges in the later part
of the year rest on seasonal coal and foodstuffs—both of which are doomed by
weak global demand.
U.S. Ecology Earnings Preview
U.S. Ecology closed this week at
$46.39. This price represents a 4%
decrease over the last month, a 2.9% increase QTD, and a 15.6% increase
YTD. We entered this position at a price
of $44.13 nearly one year ago, a 5% gain ITD.
ECOL is scheduled to report earnings on November 4th, the
latest such date in our sector. To recap
the previous earnings release, UNP surprised the markets by posting revenue
that more than doubled its previous quarter; the same held for operating
income. However, EPS only arrived at a
disappointing $0.10, due entirely to a one-time good-will impairment.
There is no reason U.S Ecology shouldn’t
repeat this performance. It is currently
in the midst of numerous long-term contracts, and its backlog is strong and
growing. Its environmental service
divisions are slated by management to have an unprecedented year. In fact, management expects that, even despite
the downward adjustment of Q2 EPS, ECOL will finish 2015 at the upper-end of
its previously forecasted $1.76-1.92 EPS range.
Wall Street shares this opinion, predicting a consensus EPS of $0.66
this quarter. Based on the contributions
of six analysts, it has assigned an “overweight” rating to the equity—this
matches the ratings from three months ago.
U.S. Ecology will pay its $0.18 dividend, as announced, on 10/19.
U.S. Ecology still expresses
confidence in the immediate benefits of its August divestiture of All-State
Power Vac, completed in the hopes of streamlining operations. In addition, just this past month, ECOL has
been in the middle of a battle with Detroit taxpayers. It had begun to expand operations at one of
its waste treatment plants in the city, one that specializes in the
detoxification of naturally-occurring radiation from fracking. This plant even gained necessary state
approval to begin treating greater quantities of waste from neighboring states. However, in response to due diligence from a
few journalists and the public, this will be halted. This was a major project, but bearing in mind
the history of safety at this plant, management expects the expansion to resume
in the near future. Little else has happened this quarter in the way of company news.
Jet Blue Earnings Preview
Stock of Jet Blue finished the week at $24.10. We were disappointed to see JBLU drop from
its high on Monday of $26.82, a 10% drop.
The decline, taking place almost entirely on Monday, occurred after JP
Morgan downgraded the stock. Despite
this volatile reaction, the market has a positive opinion on JBLU: there are
nearly as many ‘buys’ as ‘holds,’ leading to a strong rating of
‘overweight.’ Investors have received a
very good return on stock of JBLU over the past year. Indeed, it has returned 5% QTD, 52% YTD, and
35% ITD, as we entered this position at $17.84 this past spring.
There is reason to believe Jet Blue will perform well
when it reports earnings on October 27th. Wall Street EPS estimates have been periodically
revised upward, currently standing at $0.57.
Revenue is expected to increase 10.2% YOY, in part driven by a 13.1%
increase in available seat miles to 3.8 billion in the month of September. In the airline industry, this variable is a
crucial determinant of revenue estimates.
Moreover, industry earnings estimates represent a 137% increase from the
previous quarter.
Jet Blue is positioned well in the current economic
climate. The continued appreciation of
the USD has enabled domestic flyers to command more buyer power when
flying. On the hand, international
flyers will find the rates of the U.S. airlines considerably more expensive in
their home currency. This adversely
impacts such airlines like Delta, wielding a large international presence, but
for Jet Blue, operating almost entirely within domestic borders, currency
values have driven top-line growth. This
will certainly continue, and a decision to raise interest rates will only
accelerate this trend.
Tuesday, September 15, 2015
Union Pacific - 9/15/15 Update
Stock of Union Pacific has stabilized near $87. The current price stood at $87.98 as the markets closed today. Share prices have changed very little during the past week. However, the past month marks a 5% decline in share prices, almost certainly due to panic in the Chinese economy, a significant end-point for the goods shipped by Union Pacific.
With nearly two months passed since third quarter earnings,--one in which EPS, but not revenue, beat analyst estimates--some of the factors that beleaguered top-line numbers still stand. Foremost, the declining demand for coal continues. Coal accounts for 18% of Union Pacific's revenue, and declined by 18% year-over-year this past quarter. The White House aims to cut carbon emissions in the power generation, the primary coal market, by 32% within 15 years. Management expects coal revenue, as a percent of total revenue, to decline from its previous 18%. Stronger automotive and general freight has improved the shortfall.
Expectations for Union Pacific remain positive. A few major institutions, including Bank of America, Cowen and Company, and Topeka Capital Markets, have upgraded stock of UNP. Price targets are lower than in the past, but all exceed $100. In addition, Morningstar recently upgraded Union Pacific debt to a ranking of 'A,' citing reliable cash flows and return on equity. Accordingly, we remain convicted in this position.
Sunday, June 14, 2015
Spectrum Brand Holdings (SPB)
At the end of May, Spectrum Brand Holdings
closed at $96.65. Since then they have decreased $0.37 leaving them at a price
of $96.28, demonstrating a relative stability in the stock.
Given the current volatility of our markets and the diversified nature of this
stock, this minimal decrease in stock price is to be expected and doesn’t in
itself hold any indicative any negative signs for this company. Since our
purchase of the stock on March 3rd, it has increased in value by
$2.30.
SPB is diversified across
various products and brand names allowing a lot of their unsystematic risk to
be diversified away. Recently SPB has increased their consumer diversity by
adding Armored AutoGroup Parent Inc. to their product line. Spectrum Brand
Holdings still holds true to our thesis of them having a great reputation, loyal
customers and diversified product line. This assures investors like us they are
a safe company that will flourish with a good economy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)